© Geriatric Times. All rights reserved.
Treating American Indians/Alaskan Native Elders
By Melvina McCabe, M.D.
Geriatric Times November/December 2001 Vol. II Issue 6
The American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) elder population is rapidly expanding. According to U.S. Census rates between 1980 and 1998, the American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut population aged 65 and older increased by 33% compared to an increase of 9% in the same-aged white elder population (U.S. Census Bureau, 1999). This increase does not include those aged 45 to 65, considered as elders by many AI/AN populations. In addition, many AI/ANs aged 55 to 65 have the same number of chronic diseases and complications as do whites aged 65 and older (National Indian Council on Aging, 1981). Following recommendations to include those 55 and over in programs serving AI/AN elders, a review was conducted on the issue of redefining elders based on chronological age versus functional status (Indian Health Service [IHS], 1995). This review noted that tribes differ in their definition of elder. Health care professionals should be cognizant of cultural age-appropriateness in order to identify those at risk and to provide the best quality care (see Table).One factor explaining the expansion of this segment of the AI/AN population is the increasing life expectancy (see Figure 1). The life expectancy for AI/ANs born between 1972 and 1974 was 63.5 years, compared to 71.1 years for those born between 1992 and 1994 (IHS, 1997). There has been a corresponding increase in the number of chronic diseases and rates of disability for AI/AN elders. According to 1997 IHS data, the top five leading causes of death among AI/ANs between the ages of 55 to 64 are diseases of the heart, malignant neoplasms, cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and pneumonia and influenza (see Figure 2).
It is critical to recognize the heterogeneity between and within the 500 to 600 tribal groups, which is manifested in the epidemiology of disease and the cultural values and beliefs of each group. For example, while the overall leading causes of death among AI/ANs are diseases of the heart, in the Alaska, Navajo and Albuquerque areas they are accidents and adverse effects (IHS, 1998-1999). One must avoid the tendency to generalize the following findings, discussion and recommendations to all tribal groups and villages.
Epidemiology of Disease
According to results from the Strong Heart Study, a prospective epidemiologic study of AIs in Arizona, Oklahoma, North Dakota and South Dakota between 1989 and 1995, the coronary vascular disease (CVD) incidence rates for AIs aged 45 to 74 was approximately two times higher than in a similar study of whites and African-Americans, and the CVD rates for AIs appeared to be increasing (Howard et al., 1999). In this same study, stroke rates for AI women were similar to other U.S. populations, but rates for AI men were lower. Diabetes, which continues to increase in AI/AN populations, had a significant independent effect on CVD rates in this population. In the Strong Heart Study, diabetes prevalence rates ranged from 32.4% to 70.9%, with higher prevalence rates and higher rates of central adiposity and unfavorable lipoprotein changes in women compared to men (Howard et al., 1998).
An interesting diabetes aside is a study that found a greater difference in the prevalence rate of diabetes among the AI geriatric population (age 55 to 74) -- but not among those 45 to 54-using the newer American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria compared to the World Health Organization criteria (Lee et al., 2000).
Among AI/AN men, lung, prostate, colon, stomach and liver cancers are the top five leading causes of cancer deaths, while among AI/AN women, lung, breast, colon, ovarian and pancreatic cancers head the list (IHS, 1997). Palliative care for these and other cancers is an area of cancer therapy that is relatively underdeveloped in AI/AN communities. Vaccination rates as low as 49% for influenza and 22% for pneumococcus were found in an urban AI population (Buchwald et al., 2001).
Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis compose the ninth leading cause of death among AI/AN elders (IHS, 1997). The medical complications of cirrhosis and liver failure from alcoholism are well-known. In addition, alcoholism accounts for a portion of the high mortality rates from accidents and injuries, the seventh leading cause of death among AI/AN elders. In one study that looked specifically at an urban Indian elder population, the proportion of AI/AN heavy drinkers was no different from that of the general population, but the age-specific (age 65 to 74) alcohol death rate was higher than in a similar white population (Barker and Kramer, 1996). There are, however, regional variations. In a substudy of the Strong Heart Study on the Cheyenne population (age 45 to 76), more elder men (71%) than women (28%) used alcohol heavily (Lowe et al., 1997). Participants in this study were asked if they ever drank heavily, but there was no quantified amount to define heavy drinking. Men were more likely to be current drinkers, binge drinkers and to have a positive screen for alcoholism using the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). Women who were heavy drinkers were more likely to show signs of depression.
Treatment Needs
There is much to learn about and to determine for AI/AN communities, whose cultural values and beliefs may not be congruent with those of Western society and medicine. Organ transplantation and advanced directives are ethical areas not clearly defined for this population.
In 1991, the federal Patient Self-Determination Act requiring health care facilities to inform patients of their right to accept or reject any medical therapy was enacted. Since that time, it has become evident that discussion methods may need to be revised when dealing with AI/AN elders. For example, in a sample of Navajo patients (mean age=60), it was found that discussing matters concerning death and dying may bring them to reality (Carrese and Rhodes, 1995). Their recommended approach for such discussions included: a) making an assessment of the patient's willingness to discuss this information; b) preparing for such discussions by establishing a trusting relationship, involving family, making it clear that no ill will is intended and involving traditional healers if desired; c) the discussion must be positive, not hurried, and third-person reference is preferred; and d) discussion follow-up must reveal actions by the providers that relay hope (Carrese and Rhodes, 2000).
A similar approach may be used for other AI/AN tribes and villages, but it must be individually tailored. The timing of the discussion of advanced directives also may vary within AI/AN communities compared to the white population. Western medicine recommends that advanced directives discussions be conducted in an elective situation such as a clinic, as opposed to an acute emergency situation. Within some AI communities, however, the discussion seemed most successful when conducted in the acute situation (Hepburn and Reed, 1995).
Another obvious factor is the educational level of the patient, particularly if the information is delivered in writing. Providers must determine the patient's first language. If the AI/AN language is primarily spoken-and this is likely with the elder population-then effective medical translators must be employed who understand the medical terms that are used, are aware of the limits of the communication process (i.e., the translator must not interpose their own words/beliefs into the communication) and understand the ethics of translation. Knowledge of the race and cultural beliefs of the translator are also critical. For example, there may be a taboo against using a Navajo translator to enhance communication around death and dying issues, as the translator may be accused by the patient of wishing death upon them. Several studies have supported the concept that effective communication between health care provider and patient is enhanced by the use of medically trained interpreters and by the provider's knowledge of the patient's culture (D'Avanzo, 1992; Haffner, 1992; Wardin, 1996).
Very little is known about palliative care approaches and treatment among AI/ANs. This should prompt health care providers to pay particular attention to this area of medicine, as AI/AN communities do find this an important issue. Providers must also realize that the current Western paradigm of palliative care may need to be tailored to the unique needs of AI/AN communities.
In all interventions, the most important criterion is respect for the patient. With respect comes the acknowledgement and acceptance of the patient and their culture, enhanced communication -- the building stone for the development of trust -- and equality in the patient/physician relationship.
Dr. McCabe is associate professor in the department of family and community medicine at University of New Mexico School of Medicine. A Navajo physician, she chairs the geriatric section of her department.References
Barker JC, Kramer BJ (1996), Alcohol consumption among older urban American Indians. J Stud Alcohol 57(2):119-124 [see comments].
Buchwald D, Furman R, Ashton S, Manson S (2001), Preventive care of older urban American Indians and Alaska Natives in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 16(4):257-261.
Carrese JA, Rhodes LA (1995), Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation: benefit or harm? JAMA 274(10):826-829.
Carrese JA, Rhodes LA (2000), Bridging cultural differences in medical practice. The case of discussing negative information with Navajo patients. J Gen Intern Med 15(2):92-96.
D'Avanzo CE (1992), Barriers to health care for Vietnamese refugees. J Prof Nurs 8(4):245-253.
Haffner L (1992), Translation is not enough. Interpreting in a medical setting. West J Med 157(3):255-259.
Hepburn K, Reed R (1995), Ethical and clinical issues with Native-American elders. End-of-life decision making. Clin Geriatr Med 11(1):97-111.
Howard BV, Cowan LD, Go O et al. (1998), Adverse effects of diabetes on multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors in women. The Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 21(8):1258-1265.
Howard BV, Lee ET, Cowan LD et al. (1999), Rising tide of cardiovascular disease in American Indians. The Strong Heart Study. Circulation 99(18):2389-2395.
IHS (1995), American Indian and Alaska Native Elders: An Assessment of Their Current Status and Provision of Services. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
IHS (1997), Trends in Indian Health, 1997. Available at: www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/Publications/trends97/tds97pt3.pdf. Accessed Sept. 12, 2001.
IHS (1998-1999), Regional Differences in Indian Health, 1998-99. Available at: www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/Publications/trends98/RD_98a.pdf. Accessed Oct. 19, 2001.
Lee ET, Howard BV, Go O et al. (2000), Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in three American Indian populations. A comparison of the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria and the 1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 23(2):181-186.
Lowe LP, Long CR, Wallace RB, Welty TK (1997), Epidemiology of alcohol use in a group of older American Indians. Ann Epidemiol 7(4):241-248.
National Indian Council on Aging (1981), American Indian Elderly: A National Profile. Albuquerque, N.M.: National Indian Council on Aging.
Wardin K (1996), A comparison of verbal evaluation of clients with limited English proficiency and English-speaking clients in physical rehabilitation settings. Am J Occup Ther 50(10):816-825.
U.S. Census Bureau (1999), Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1999. 119th ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.